Hi Imran,
This is a good question, and it is one that a lot of beneficiaries have. To better understand this, it is best to look at the relationships between banks.
Since there are thousands of banks worldwide, it is impossible to have a correspondent relationship with every bank. It is also impposible to have swift authentication (a swift RMA) with every bank as well.
Given the above, issuing banks will normally use a preferred correspondent if no relationship exists. This is a standard practice worldwide.
Also, there are handful of banks, normally the very large banks, that will ignore the instructions even if they have a correspondent or swift relationship. These bank's have an internal policy to send the letter of credit to a specific bank in that country. That bank is usually either a branch of the issuing bank or owned in part or fully by the issuing bank. This is to generate business for that bank.
As a beneficiary, what are your options? You can do the following:
1. Check with your bank to see if they have a relationship with the issuing bank. If not, see if they can set up at a minimum a swift relationship (known as an RMA). This way the issuing bank may be able to use your bank.
2. Continue to accept the letters of credit as is and process according to the instructions contained in the letter of credit. You may have to incur additional costs because of this.
3. Have the letters of credit changed so that the charges for any bank other than your bank are for the account of the applicant. This may save you some fees, but your transaction may still be delayed given the number of banks involved.
4. If your bank does have a relationship with the issuing bank, and the issuing bank is routing the transaction for the benefit of collecting additional fees for its branch or a bank that it owns, you can refuse to accept the letter of credit. Let the applicant know of this routing and ask them to use a different bank.
5. You can establish a relationship with the advising bank.
I hope this helps you out.
Best regards,
LC Sam
Hi Friends
I agree with LC Sam, but I have a proposal:change the art 2 UCP 600 Definitions:
-Advising bank means the bank that advises the credit to the beneficiary directly, as per issuing bank request.-
Probably the receiver bank of a SWIFT message MT700 will be compelled to advise l/c to the bank indicated in field 59.
Many banks, moreover, receive a big earning in charging advising comissions.
Other comments appreciated
Ciao
thanks for very conprehensive reply
Recent comments
35 min 32 sec ago
40 min 56 sec ago
47 min 38 sec ago
1 hour 37 min ago
4 hours 19 min ago
6 hours 28 min ago
7 hours 43 min ago
7 hours 48 min ago
1 day 44 min ago
1 day 2 hours ago