Dear all
Perhaps we all know that a b/l which shows goods shipped on deck is prohibited by UCP600. However, I have been faced with a b/l which states goods are loaded and shipped "Under deck". In my opinion, these phrases are of the same meaning, but i am not so sure about this. What's your opinion? Tnks
Dear Minh Trang,
the deck is the part of a ship, you could normally walk on at the fresh air, in the example of the "ship" underneath the part of the ship left and right of "/TZZ\".
__________/TZZ\___________________
\_______________________________/
So "on Deck" is the same as "above Deck" whereas "under Deck" is the same as "below Deck".
The risk of containers being lost "on Deck" is much higher as "under Deck". That's why insurances do not like to insure them (at the same price) - but if you have a container ship many if not most of the container spaces are on deck.
That's why a B/L bearing a clause that goods M A Y B E stowed on deck are acceptable (art 26 a) 2nd sentence).
So the clause contained in your B/L is absolutely acceptable!
-Each long journey starts with a small step-
Best regards
Frammi
dear minh
so far i know under deck is just the opposite of on deck. in fact its the under deck BL that we all seek for. as per general shipping law, if goods are shipped on deck, a special notation to that effect is necessary. but a BL which is silent means the goods are loaded on under deck. if you examine insurance document, you will see generally there are clauses like "coverage apply only if goods are shipped under deck". so nothing to worry about. hope that answer the question.
Shahriar
Thanks a lot. Yr clear answers are of great help.
Recent comments
1 hour 2 min ago
2 hours 5 min ago
2 hours 11 min ago
2 hours 17 min ago
3 hours 7 min ago
5 hours 50 min ago
7 hours 58 min ago
9 hours 13 min ago
9 hours 18 min ago
1 day 2 hours ago