goods shipped "On deck" vs. "Under deck"

3 replies [Last post]
Minh Trang
Offline
Joined: 10/24/2007
Posts:
Printer-friendly versionSend to friendPDF version

Dear all

Perhaps we all know that a b/l which shows goods shipped on deck is prohibited by UCP600. However, I have been faced with a b/l which states goods are loaded and shipped "Under deck". In my opinion, these phrases are of the same meaning, but i am not so sure about this. What's your opinion? Tnks

Frammi
Offline
Joined: 08/17/2007
Posts:
Under Deck shipment

Dear Minh Trang,

the deck is the part of a ship, you could normally walk on at the fresh air, in the example of the "ship" underneath the part of the ship left and right of "/TZZ\".

__________/TZZ\___________________
\_______________________________/

So "on Deck" is the same as "above Deck" whereas "under Deck" is the same as "below Deck".

The risk of containers being lost "on Deck" is much higher as "under Deck". That's why insurances do not like to insure them (at the same price) - but if you have a container ship many if not most of the container spaces are on deck.

That's why a B/L bearing a clause that goods     M A Y    B E    stowed on deck are acceptable (art 26 a) 2nd sentence).

So the clause contained in your B/L is absolutely acceptable!

 

-Each long journey starts with a small step-

Best regards

Frammi

shahriar
Offline
Joined: 08/25/2007
Posts:
not the same

dear minh

so far i know under deck is just the opposite of on deck. in fact its the under deck BL that we all seek for. as per general shipping law, if goods are shipped on deck, a special notation to that effect is necessary. but a BL which is silent means the goods are loaded on under deck. if you examine insurance document, you will see generally there are clauses like "coverage apply only if goods are shipped under deck". so nothing to worry about. hope that answer the question.

Shahriar

Minh Trang
Offline
Joined: 10/24/2007
Posts:
thanks a lot Shariah, Frammi

Thanks a lot. Yr clear answers are of great help.