Penalty Clause for Late Delivery of Shipment:

4 replies [Last post]
ignorant bliss
Offline
Joined: 04/14/2010
Printer-friendly versionSend by emailPDF version

Can we put following clause in LC ?

Penalty Clause for Late Delivery of Shipment:

Deduction of 2.5% from the invoice value for delay of each week or part thereof till 12 weeks.

Goods will not be accepted If delayed beyond 12 weeks.

 

Is such a clause allowed under UCP ?

Is it practically implementable?

If not, what is the best way to put a penalty clause ? Any similar example will help.

pan
Offline
Joined: 09/13/2007
typical Contract clause...

Hi Friend,

it is very difficult to "translate" sale's contract clause in terms and conditions of an l/c.

Someone is inserting clause in l/c as follows:

-shipment later than the date indicated, if accepted by the applicant and issuing bank, will be subjected to a penalty of EUR

  ... for each day.....

This type of condition is under applicant consent.

or

-shipment later than the date indicated in the l/, but within the expiry date, acceptable under a penalty of EUR.. per day

to be deducted automatically by proceeds.

this condition works automatically.

 

So, all is possible, if accepted by the beneficiary and, even, by the banks. The wording must be clear and not ambiguos.

We have customers using different penalty clause, in advising the receipt of documents, compliant or not, we ask if we have to deduct this penalty charges.Sometime the aèèlicant said no, as it has been agreed with beneficiary.

Other comments appreciated

Ciao

 

 

 

phill doran
Offline
Joined: 02/10/2009
measure for measure...

Hello again
I am not a banker so I cannot help you here, but could you perhaps clarify two points which may assist other contributors to guide you;

Firstly, is the penalty ‘date’ linked to sailing or arrival – i.e. is it a penalty for late shipment or late delivery?

Secondly, if it is for late delivery, how will this be measured, how will the bank gauge compliance or not?
I imagine that what you require can be achieved – perhaps the credit will need to be twisted out of shape to do it – but I think the issue is always (as with any credit) the detail of the documentation which will measure the performance (or lack thereof).

Again, I wish you well
 
Cheers

phill
“...in the kingdom of the blind; what you see is what you get...”

 

 

ignorant bliss
Offline
Joined: 04/14/2010
Hi Phil,Thanks for the

Hi Phil,

Thanks for the reply. You've raised a good point.

 

Revised details as below:

 

Penalty Clause for Late Shipping of Goods (After Latest Date of Shipment):

Deduction of 2.5% from the invoice value for delay of each week or part thereof till 12 weeks. Goods will not be accepted if shipment is shipped on board beyond 12 weeks.

 

Further:
Suppose 44 C: Latest Date of Shipment: 150207 (07 Feb 2015)

Then as per UCP: 31D: Date of Expiry: 150228 (28 Feb 2015) i.e. 3 weeks

 

Does it mean penalty for more than 3 weeks can not be imposed as the LC itself will expire by the end of 3 weeks ?

 

Is it correct to say that, if the Shipment (On Board) is delayed by more than 3 week, a new LC should be opened.

 

Hope I've not made it more confusing.

 

Thanks

phill doran
Offline
Joined: 02/10/2009
deteriorating values...

Hello once more

If the last shipment date is the 7th of February, then any document presented with a shipment date later than this would be discrepant and rejected regardless of the expiry date and/or the credit still being ‘live’.

What you are really looking for is a credit allowing partial shipments and a series of permissible shipment dates with a corresponding reduction in value as each progressive date arises.

Exactly how it would be worded I am unsure, but it can certainly be measured as the shipment date is part of the submitted document (i.e. the ‘shipped on board’ date).

I imagine “x” unit price for shipment before the first date, “y” unit price for shipments on or before the second date and so on – of course there must be a ‘last’ shipment date to close it all off. I should imagine you’d need to finance the entire credit using a value at a unit price of “x”, for that is the credit’s potential.

As I say, I am sure it can be done, but you’d need a banker for the detail of the wording.

Cheers

phill
“...in the kingdom of the blind; what you see is what you get...”

//
//